Docket Tracker
Recon utility for tracking internet-related civil & criminal case dockets. Currently scrapes data from RECAP/PACER. More sources coming soon.
Tag Cloud
Caveats
Some dockets will update here twice. That is because CourtListener and/or PACER have the case duplicated, and downloadable PDF's are scattered across both dockets. Maybe there will be a fix for it eventually.
Latest Docket Updates
Subscribe: [Atom] [RSS]
Minute entry from 2025-05-21 in United States v. NEPAL, 1:25-cr-00304
Filed under 764+ONA on May 21, 2025 [See all in United States v. Nepal]
MINUTE ORDER as to PRASAN NEPAL (1): As required by Rule 5(f), the United States is ordered to produce all exculpatory evidence to the defendant pursuant to Brady v. Maryland and its progeny. Not doing so in a timely manner may result in sanctions, including exclusion of evidence, adverse jury instructions, dismissal of charges and contempt proceedings. Signed by Magistrate Judge Matthew J. Sharbaugh on 5/21/2025. (ztl) [1:25-mj-00061-ZMF] [Read More]
Entry #10 in United States v. Valdez, 1:25-mj-00564
Filed under 764+ONA on May 21, 2025 [See all in United States v. Valdez]
Arrest Warrant Returned Executed on 5/19/2025 in case as to Rumaldo Valdez. (eta) (Entered: 05/21/2025) [Read More]
Entry #9 in United States v. Valdez, 1:25-mj-00564
Filed under 764+ONA on May 21, 2025 [See all in United States v. Valdez]
NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: appearing for Rumaldo Valdez Notice of Change of Counsel (Mizono, Maximilian) (Entered: 05/21/2025) [Read More]
Entry #10 in United States v. Valdez, 1:25-cr-00112
Filed under 764+ONA on May 21, 2025 [See all in United States v. Valdez]
Arrest Warrant Returned Executed on 5/19/2025 in case as to Rumaldo Valdez. (eta) [1:25-mj-00564-WRP] (Entered: 05/21/2025) [Read More]
Entry #9 in United States v. Valdez, 1:25-cr-00112
Filed under 764+ONA on May 21, 2025 [See all in United States v. Valdez]
NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: appearing for Rumaldo Valdez Notice of Change of Counsel (Mizono, Maximilian) [1:25-mj-00564-WRP] (Entered: 05/21/2025) [Read More]
Entry #14 in United States v. NEPAL, 1:25-cr-00304
Filed under 764+ONA on May 21, 2025 [See all in United States v. Nepal]
Arrest Warrant Returned Executed on 5/21/2025 as to PRASAN NEPAL (1). (ztl) [1:25-mj-00061-ZMF] (Entered: 05/21/2025) [Read More]
Entry #8 in United States v. Valdez, 1:25-mj-00564
Filed under 764+ONA on May 20, 2025 [See all in United States v. Valdez]
CJA 23 Financial Affidavit - by Rumaldo Valdez (jo) (Entered: 05/20/2025) [Read More]
Entry #7 in United States v. Valdez, 1:25-mj-00564
Filed under 764+ONA on May 20, 2025 [See all in United States v. Valdez]
EP: INITIAL APPEARANCE as to Defendant Rumaldo Valdez held. AUSA Jonathan Slack appeared on behalf of the United States. Jacquelyn Esser appeared on behalf of Defendant. Defendant present and in custody. Defendant sworn to Financial Affidavit. The Court appointed Ms. Esser and the Office of the Federal Public Defender as Counsel for the Defendant. The Court held an Initial Appearance. The Court reviewed with the Defendant that this was his first appearance in Court and it was not the time to answer to the charges. Instead, an Initial Appearance hearing was to make sure that the Defendant understood the general nature of the charge alleged in the Criminal Complaint, his Constitutional rights including his right to counsel, and to set further hearing dates in the case. Counsel represented that she reviewed the Criminal Complaint with Defendant and that Defendant understands the general nature of the charge alleged in the Criminal Complaint. Defendant affirmed that he understood the general nature of the charges to the Court. The Government filed a Motion to Detain Defendant Without Bail, ECF No. 6 . Detention Hearing is set for May 23, 2025 at 10:30 a.m. in Courtroom 7 before Magistrate Judge Barry M. Kurren. Preliminary Hearing is set for June 3, 2025 at 10:30 a.m. in Courtroom 6 before Magistrate Judge Kenneth J. Mansfield. The Court reminded the government of its obligations under Rule 5(f) and as set out in this Courts General Order dated February 1, 2021: The Court orders the prosecution to comply with its disclosure obligations under Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), and its progeny. Failing to do so in a timely manner may result in consequences, including, but not limited to: exclusion of evidence, adverse jury instructions, dismissal of charges, contempt proceedings, court sanctions, and/or referral to disciplinary counsel. Defendant remanded to the custody of the U.S. Marshal Service. Initial Appearance as to Rumaldo Valdez held on 5/20/2025 Detention Hearing is set for 5/23/2025 10:30 AM in Courtroom 7 before MAGISTRATE JUDGE BARRY M. KURREN Preliminary Hearing is set for 6/3/2025 10:30 AM in Courtroom 6 before MAGISTRATE JUDGE KENNETH J. MANSFIELD ***Procedural Interval start as to Rumaldo Valdez ***Location start as to Rumaldo Valdez (FTR-CT 7 / 1:42 pm - 1:44 pm) (MAGISTRATE JUDGE BARRY M. KURREN) (jo) (Entered: 05/20/2025) [Read More]
Entry #6 in United States v. Valdez, 1:25-mj-00564
Filed under 764+ONA on May 20, 2025 [See all in United States v. Valdez]
MOTION to Detain Defendant Without Bail by USA as to Rumaldo Valdez. (Attachments: # 1 Unsealed Application for Search Warrant and Supporting Affidavit)(Slack, Jonathan) (Entered: 05/20/2025) [Read More]
Entry #8 in United States v. Valdez, 1:25-cr-00112
Filed under 764+ONA on May 20, 2025 [See all in United States v. Valdez]
CJA 23 Financial Affidavit - by Rumaldo Valdez (jo) [1:25-mj-00564-WRP] (Entered: 05/20/2025) [Read More]
Entry #7 in United States v. Valdez, 1:25-cr-00112
Filed under 764+ONA on May 20, 2025 [See all in United States v. Valdez]
EP: INITIAL APPEARANCE as to Defendant Rumaldo Valdez held. AUSA Jonathan Slack appeared on behalf of the United States. Jacquelyn Esser appeared on behalf of Defendant. Defendant present and in custody. Defendant sworn to Financial Affidavit. The Court appointed Ms. Esser and the Office of the Federal Public Defender as Counsel for the Defendant. The Court held an Initial Appearance. The Court reviewed with the Defendant that this was his first appearance in Court and it was not the time to answer to the charges. Instead, an Initial Appearance hearing was to make sure that the Defendant understood the general nature of the charge alleged in the Criminal Complaint, his Constitutional rights including his right to counsel, and to set further hearing dates in the case. Counsel represented that she reviewed the Criminal Complaint with Defendant and that Defendant understands the general nature of the charge alleged in the Criminal Complaint. Defendant affirmed that he understood the general nature of the charges to the Court. The Government filed a Motion to Detain Defendant Without Bail, ECF No. 6 . Detention Hearing is set for May 23, 2025 at 10:30 a.m. in Courtroom 7 before Magistrate Judge Barry M. Kurren. Preliminary Hearing is set for June 3, 2025 at 10:30 a.m. in Courtroom 6 before Magistrate Judge Kenneth J. Mansfield. The Court reminded the government of its obligations under Rule 5(f) and as set out in this Courts General Order dated February 1, 2021: The Court orders the prosecution to comply with its disclosure obligations under Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), and its progeny. Failing to do so in a timely manner may result in consequences, including, but not limited to: exclusion of evidence, adverse jury instructions, dismissal of charges, contempt proceedings, court sanctions, and/or referral to disciplinary counsel. Defendant remanded to the custody of the U.S. Marshal Service. Initial Appearance as to Rumaldo Valdez held on 5/20/2025 Detention Hearing is set for 5/23/2025 10:30 AM in Courtroom 7 before MAGISTRATE JUDGE BARRY M. KURREN Preliminary Hearing is set for 6/3/2025 10:30 AM in Courtroom 6 before MAGISTRATE JUDGE KENNETH J. MANSFIELD ***Procedural Interval start as to Rumaldo Valdez ***Location start as to Rumaldo Valdez (FTR-CT 7 / 1:42 pm - 1:44 pm) (MAGISTRATE JUDGE BARRY M. KURREN) (jo) [1:25-mj-00564-WRP] (Entered: 05/20/2025) [Read More]
Entry #6 in United States v. Valdez, 1:25-cr-00112
Filed under 764+ONA on May 20, 2025 [See all in United States v. Valdez]
MOTION to Detain Defendant Without Bail by USA as to Rumaldo Valdez. (Attachments: # 1 Unsealed Application for Search Warrant and Supporting Affidavit)(Slack, Jonathan) [1:25-mj-00564-WRP] (Entered: 05/20/2025) [Read More]
Minute entry from 2025-05-19 in United States v. Valdez, 1:25-mj-00564
Filed under 764+ONA on May 19, 2025 [See all in United States v. Valdez]
Arrest of Rumaldo Valdez on 5/19/2025. (eta) [Read More]
Entry #5 in United States v. Valdez, 1:25-mj-00564
Filed under 764+ONA on May 19, 2025 [See all in United States v. Valdez]
ORDER UNSEALING CRIMINAL COMPLAINT re 4 as to Rumaldo Valdez (1) - Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE BARRY M. KURREN on 5/19/2025. (eta) (Entered: 05/19/2025) [Read More]
Entry #4 in United States v. Valdez, 1:25-mj-00564
Filed under 764+ONA on May 19, 2025 [See all in United States v. Valdez]
Ex Parte MOTION to Unseal Criminal Complaint - filed by USA as to Rumaldo Valdez. (cib) (Entered: 05/19/2025) [Read More]
Minute entry from 2025-05-19 in United States v. Valdez, 1:25-mj-00564
Filed under 764+ONA on May 19, 2025 [See all in United States v. Valdez]
~Util - Add and Terminate Attorneys [Read More]
Entry #3 in United States v. Valdez, 1:25-mj-00564
Filed under 764+ONA on May 19, 2025 [See all in United States v. Valdez]
EO: as to Rumaldo Valdez - An Initial Appearance is set for 5/20/2025 at 1:30 PM in Courtroom 7 before MAGISTRATE JUDGE BARRY M. KURREN. Parties have been notified. (Attorney Jacquelyn Tryon Esser and the Office of the Federal Public Defender are provisionally appointed pending submission of Defendant's financial affidavit.) (MAGISTRATE JUDGE BARRY M. KURREN) (jo) (Entered: 05/19/2025) [Read More]
Minute entry from 2025-05-19 in United States v. Valdez, 1:25-cr-00112
Filed under 764+ONA on May 19, 2025 [See all in United States v. Valdez]
Arrest of Rumaldo Valdez on 5/19/2025. (eta) [1:25-mj-00564-WRP] [Read More]
Entry #5 in United States v. Valdez, 1:25-cr-00112
Filed under 764+ONA on May 19, 2025 [See all in United States v. Valdez]
ORDER UNSEALING CRIMINAL COMPLAINT re 4 as to Rumaldo Valdez (1) - Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE BARRY M. KURREN on 5/19/2025. (eta) [1:25-mj-00564-WRP] (Entered: 05/19/2025) [Read More]
Entry #4 in United States v. Valdez, 1:25-cr-00112
Filed under 764+ONA on May 19, 2025 [See all in United States v. Valdez]
Ex Parte MOTION to Unseal Criminal Complaint - filed by USA as to Rumaldo Valdez. (cib) [1:25-mj-00564-WRP] (Entered: 05/19/2025) [Read More]
Minute entry from 2025-05-19 in United States v. Valdez, 1:25-cr-00112
Filed under 764+ONA on May 19, 2025 [See all in United States v. Valdez]
Arrest [Read More]
Entry #3 in United States v. Valdez, 1:25-cr-00112
Filed under 764+ONA on May 19, 2025 [See all in United States v. Valdez]
EO: as to Rumaldo Valdez - An Initial Appearance is set for 5/20/2025 at 1:30 PM in Courtroom 7 before MAGISTRATE JUDGE BARRY M. KURREN. Parties have been notified. (Attorney Jacquelyn Tryon Esser and the Office of the Federal Public Defender are provisionally appointed pending submission of Defendant's financial affidavit.) (MAGISTRATE JUDGE BARRY M. KURREN) (jo) [1:25-mj-00564-WRP] (Entered: 05/19/2025) [Read More]
Entry #29 in JACQUELINE ANNE SINGH, 24-04085
Filed under stewanon on May 18, 2025 [See all in Bankr. Jackqueline Anne Singh]
Certificate of service (RE: related document(s)28) Notice Date 05/18/2025. (Admin.) (Entered: 05/19/2025) [Read More]
Entry #8 in Connor v. Goldsmith, 4:24-cv-40127
Filed under insurgency on May 16, 2025 [See all in Connor v. Goldsmith]
District Judge Margaret R. Guzman: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered. ORDER REQUIRING AN AMENDED COMPLAINTIf Plaintiff wishes to proceed with this action, Plaintiff must file, within 28 days of the date of this Order (i.e., on or before June 13, 2025), an amended complaint setting forth a plausible claim upon which relief may be granted. Because Plaintiff is proceeding in forma pauperis, the complaint is subject to screening pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. Section 1915 authorizes federal courts to dismiss a complaint if the claims are frivolous or malicious, fail to state a claim on which relief can be granted, or seek monetary relief against a defendant who is immune from such relief. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B).When examining the sufficiency of the pleadings, the Court considers whether the plaintiff has pled enough facts to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face. Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007). A claim has facial plausibility when the plaintiff pleads factual content that allows the court to draw the reasonable inference that the defendant is liable for the misconduct alleged. Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (citation omitted). In conducting this review, the Court must liberally construe plaintiff's complaint because it is a pro se filing. See Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520-21 (1972); Rodi v. New Eng. Sch. of Law, 389 F.3d 5, 13 (1st Cir. 2004). Plaintiff, a Massachusetts resident, filed a complaint invoking this Court's diversity jurisdiction to assert claims against two California defendants. However, the facts alleged against Defendant Janet Goldsmith are insufficient to make out a claim of negligence. As to the claims against Defendant Bernard Goldsmith, it is unclear which alleged actions form the basis of the claim for intentional inflection of emotional distress and the complaint fails to clearly identify precisely which statements attributed to the defendant form the basis of the defamation claim as well as the alleged injury.To the extent Plaintiff wishes to proceed, an amended complaint -- a new stand-alone document -- that states a plausible claim must be filed. Any amended complaint must identify with precision which statements and actions by Defendant Bernard Goldsmith form the basis of the defamation and intentional infliction of emotional distress claims. Similarly, any amended complaint must identify the actions, or inactions, by Defendant Janet Goldsmith that form the basis of the negligence claim. An amended complaint completely replaces the original complaint, see Brait Builders Corp. v. Massachusetts, Div. of Capital Asset Mgt., 644 F.3d 5, 9 (1st Cir. 2011), and therefore Plaintiff should repeat in the amended complaint any allegations in the original complaint that Plaintiff wishes to be part of the operative complaint along with sufficient allegations to state a plausible claim. If an amended complaint is filed, it will be further screened pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B).SO ORDERED. (SF) (Entered: 05/16/2025) [Read More]
Minute entry from 2025-05-16 in Connor v. Goldsmith, 4:24-cv-40127
Filed under insurgency on May 16, 2025 [See all in Connor v. Goldsmith]
Order [Read More]