ORDER: The Motion for Leave to File Document Under Seal (doc. [7]) is GRANTED. Counsel appears to seek a hearing on his previous motion to withdraw from the representation of movant in this closed habeas case. Because the motion to withdraw has been denied as moot, no hearing is warranted. The motion for hearing is DENIED (doc. [6]). (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 7/17/2014) (axm) [Read More]
Minute entry from 2014-07-17 in McGraw v. United States, 3:13-cv-00643
MOTION for Hearing Pursuant to Court Order Dated July 7, 2014 in Case No. 09-CR-210-B filed by Jesse William McGraw re [5] Order. (Espinoza, Edmundo) Modified on 7/17/2014 (axm). [Read More]
Entry #5 in McGraw v. United States, 3:13-cv-00643
ORDER re: [4] MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney of Record for Defendant McGraw: Although filed in the closed criminal case, counsel appears to seek to withdraw from representation of movant in his habeas case, Cause No. 3:13-CV-643-B. To the extent that the movant seeks to have the docket in the habeas case reflect that counsel has been terminated, and that he is now pro se, the motion is granted. The Clerk's Office shall file a copy of the motion to withdraw and this order in the habeas case, and shall modify the docket to show that counsel has been terminated and that the movant is pro se in the habeas case. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 7/8/2014) (ctf) [Read More]
Minute entry from 2014-07-08 in McGraw v. United States, 3:13-cv-00643
***From Criminal Case 3:09-cr-210-B*** MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney of Record for Defendant McGraw filed by Edmundo Espinoza as to Jesse William McGraw. (ctf) [Read More]
Entry #3 in McGraw v. United States, 3:13-cv-00643
JUDGMENT: The motion for extension of time to file a Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence brought pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. (Ordered by Judge Jane J Boyle on 2/11/2013) (chmb) [Read More]
Entry #2 in McGraw v. United States, 3:13-cv-00643
ORDER: The Court Lacks subject matter jurisdiction to rule on the motion for extension of time to file a § 2255 motion, and this action is therefore DISMISSED for want of jurisdiction. (Ordered by Judge Jane J Boyle on 2/11/2013) (chmb) [Read More]
Entry #1 in McGraw v. United States, 3:13-cv-00643
New Case Notes: A filing fee is not due for this case. File to writ clerk/staff attorney. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Ramirez (see Special Order 3). Case received over counter/electronically. No prior sanctions found. (ctf) [Read More]
