at the best point internet intstitute

Docket Tracker

Tag Cloud

Filter Dockets By

Latest updates in Trainor v. McGibney

Minute entry from 2026-06-26 in TRAINOR v. MCGIBNEY, 2:24-cv-08873

Filed under rustleleague on Jun 26, 2026 [See all in Trainor v. McGibney]

Status Conference [Read More]

Entry #43 in TRAINOR v. MCGIBNEY, 2:24-cv-08873

Filed under rustleleague on Jun 26, 2026 [See all in Trainor v. McGibney]

Order AND ~Util - Set Hearings [Read More]

Minute entry from 2026-06-24 in TRAINOR v. MCGIBNEY, 2:24-cv-08873

Filed under rustleleague on Jun 24, 2026 [See all in Trainor v. McGibney]

Text Order AND ~Util - Set Hearings [Read More]

Minute entry from 2026-06-11 in TRAINOR v. MCGIBNEY, 2:24-cv-08873

Filed under rustleleague on Jun 11, 2026 [See all in Trainor v. McGibney]

Order [Read More]

Entry #40 in TRAINOR v. MCGIBNEY, 2:24-cv-08873

Filed under rustleleague on Apr 27, 2026 [See all in Trainor v. McGibney]

Letter [Read More]

Minute entry from 2026-04-21 in TRAINOR v. MCGIBNEY, 2:24-cv-08873

Filed under rustleleague on Apr 21, 2026 [See all in Trainor v. McGibney]

Motions No Longer Referred [Read More]

Minute entry from 2026-04-10 in TRAINOR v. MCGIBNEY, 2:24-cv-08873

Filed under rustleleague on Apr 10, 2026 [See all in Trainor v. McGibney]

Order [Read More]

Entry #39 in TRAINOR v. MCGIBNEY, 2:24-cv-08873

Filed under rustleleague on Apr 10, 2026 [See all in Trainor v. McGibney]

TEXT ORDER: The court has reviewed the parties' April 9, 2026 joint letter, 38, raising discovery disputes related to Defendant's responses to Plaintiff's written discovery requests. It is unclear to the Court at this time whether the parties adequately met and conferred in good faith in an attempt to informally resolve any or all of these disputes before seeking the Court's intervention. See Am. Sched. Order, D.E. 36 para. 5. For example, while Plaintiff appears to raise four issues, Defendant's position only appears to respond to one of those issues. Accordingly, the parties shall meet and confer in an attempt to resolve or narrow down these disputes and file a joint status report on or before May 10, 2026. To the extent any discovery disputes remain, the parties shall again follow the format described in the Amended Scheduling Order. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Michael A. Hammer on 4/10/26. (tad) (Entered: 04/10/2026) [Read More]

Entry #38 in TRAINOR v. MCGIBNEY, 2:24-cv-08873

Filed under rustleleague on Apr 9, 2026 [See all in Trainor v. McGibney]

Letter [Read More]

Entry #37 in TRAINOR v. MCGIBNEY, 2:24-cv-08873

Filed under rustleleague on Mar 9, 2026 [See all in Trainor v. McGibney]

Reply Brief to Opposition to Motion [Read More]

Minute entry from 2026-03-04 in TRAINOR v. MCGIBNEY, 2:24-cv-08873

Filed under rustleleague on Mar 4, 2026 [See all in Trainor v. McGibney]

Status Conference [Read More]

Entry #36 in TRAINOR v. MCGIBNEY, 2:24-cv-08873

Filed under rustleleague on Mar 3, 2026 [See all in Trainor v. McGibney]

Scheduling Order [Read More]

Entry #35 in TRAINOR v. MCGIBNEY, 2:24-cv-08873

Filed under rustleleague on Feb 27, 2026 [See all in Trainor v. McGibney]

Joint Discovery Plan [Read More]

Minute entry from 2026-02-13 in TRAINOR v. MCGIBNEY, 2:24-cv-08873

Filed under rustleleague on Feb 13, 2026 [See all in Trainor v. McGibney]

Set/Reset Motion and R&R Deadlines/Hearings [Read More]

Entry #34 in TRAINOR v. MCGIBNEY, 2:24-cv-08873

Filed under rustleleague on Feb 12, 2026 [See all in Trainor v. McGibney]

Response in Opposition to Motion [Read More]

Entry #33 in TRAINOR v. MCGIBNEY, 2:24-cv-08873

Filed under rustleleague on Feb 11, 2026 [See all in Trainor v. McGibney]

Reconsideration [Read More]

Minute entry from 2026-02-02 in TRAINOR v. MCGIBNEY, 2:24-cv-08873

Filed under rustleleague on Feb 2, 2026 [See all in Trainor v. McGibney]

Order AND ~Util - Set Hearings [Read More]

Entry #31 in TRAINOR v. MCGIBNEY, 2:24-cv-08873

Filed under rustleleague on Jan 29, 2026 [See all in Trainor v. McGibney]

Order on Motion to Dismiss [Read More]

Entry #30 in TRAINOR v. MCGIBNEY, 2:24-cv-08873

Filed under rustleleague on Jul 28, 2025 [See all in Trainor v. McGibney]

Response (NOT Motion) [Read More]

Entry #29 in TRAINOR v. MCGIBNEY, 2:24-cv-08873

Filed under rustleleague on Jul 28, 2025 [See all in Trainor v. McGibney]

Letter [Read More]

Entry #28 in TRAINOR v. MCGIBNEY, 2:24-cv-08873

Filed under rustleleague on Jul 28, 2025 [See all in Trainor v. McGibney]

Reply Brief to Opposition to Motion [Read More]

Minute entry from 2025-07-15 in TRAINOR v. MCGIBNEY, 2:24-cv-08873

Filed under rustleleague on Jul 15, 2025 [See all in Trainor v. McGibney]

Order [Read More]

Entry #27 in TRAINOR v. MCGIBNEY, 2:24-cv-08873

Filed under rustleleague on Jul 15, 2025 [See all in Trainor v. McGibney]

TEXT ORDER: The Court is in receipt of Defendant's motion to extend the time for Defendant to file his reply. The motion was denied for quality control purposes as it incorrectly requested the relief under Local Civil Rule 6.1. However, the Court will grant Defendant's request to file his reply on July 28, 2025. No further extensions will be granted. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Michael A. Hammer on 7/15/25. (tad) (Entered: 07/15/2025) [Read More]

Minute entry from 2025-07-14 in TRAINOR v. MCGIBNEY, 2:24-cv-08873

Filed under rustleleague on Jul 14, 2025 [See all in Trainor v. McGibney]

QC - Incorrect Event Selected [Read More]

Minute entry from 2025-07-14 in TRAINOR v. MCGIBNEY, 2:24-cv-08873

Filed under rustleleague on Jul 14, 2025 [See all in Trainor v. McGibney]

Update Answer Due Deadline [Read More]

CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 The Anonymous Fruit Company The East Internet Trading Company Erischan Novelty Lanterns